Zoek naar artikelen van Gedrag & Organisatie
Gedrag & Organisatie
Rss

Gedrag & Organisatie


Meer op het gebied van Arbeid en organisatie

Over dit tijdschrift  
Aflevering 1, maart 2012 Alle samenvattingen uitklappen

Artikel

De relatie tussen werkeisen, energiebronnen, spanning en werkplezier: een kwestie van leeftijd?

Trefwoorden age, older employees, psychosocial job characteristics, Job Demands-Resources model, life cycle, Selection-Optimization-Compensation theory
Auteurs Bert Schreurs, Anja Van den Broeck, Guy Notelaers, Beate van der Heijden en Hans De Witte
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

Drawing on the Selection-Optimization-Compensation theory and the Job Demands-Resources model this study addresses the following research questions: (1) are there mean differences in the perceived levels of particular job characteristics between employees from different age groups; and (2) to what extent does the relationship between job characteristics and work outcomes (i.e., job strain and work enjoyment) differ across age groups? Data were collected from a sample of 15,464 employees, of which 3,850 were younger than 35 (young group), 7,273 were between 36 and 45 (middle group), and 4,341 were older than 45 (old group). Significant age differences were found in the levels of job characteristics: Young employees are most positive about their relationships with their colleagues and direct supervisor, and report to have the lowest levels of workload; employees from the middle group report to have the highest levels of role conflict; employees from the oldest age group perceive to have the highest levels of autonomy, and perceive more than other employees to be confronted with hindering changes at work. In addition, the strength of the relationship between job characteristics and work outcomes differed across age groups, although differences were rather small. From this we conclude that HR management should focus on creating high-quality jobs for all employees, young and old.


Bert Schreurs
Bert Schreurs is verbonden aan Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, Tongersestraat 53, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Nederland, tel: +31 43 38 83776, e-mail: b.schreurs@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Anja Van den Broeck
Anja Van den Broeck is verbonden aan de Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, België, en aan de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, België.

Guy Notelaers
Guy Notelaers is verbonden aan Maastricht University School of Business and Economics.

Beate van der Heijden
Beate Van der Heijden is verbonden aan de Radboud Universiteit, Institute for Management.

Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte is verbonden aan de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, België.
Artikel

Wanneer bevordert en wanneer hindert werkdruk het werkplekleren?

Trefwoorden Job Demands Control model, action theory, informal learning, job redesign
Auteurs Joris Van Ruysseveldt en Marius van Dijke
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

Building on theoretical frameworks like the Job Demands Control model we tested whether the relationship between workload and employees’ experiences of opportunities for workplace learning is of an inverted u-shaped nature. Furthermore we researched whether autonomy moderates this relationship. We predicted that at moderate levels of autonomy rising workload was associated with increasing learning opportunities at low levels of workload, but with decreasing learning opportunities at high levels of workload. Also, we predicted that low autonomy prevents positive effects of moderate workload from materializing whereas high autonomy makes high workload less destructive to the learning process. We found support for these ideas in a large and heterogeneous sample of Flemish working adults (FWM, 2010). These results integrate conflicting prior findings and extend Karasek’s (1979) active learning hypothesis. They also have clear implications for job redesign practices aiming to promote workplace learning opportunities.


Joris Van Ruysseveldt
J. Van Ruysseveldt is verbonden aan de Open Universiteit Nederland, Faculteit Psychologie, Heerlen. Correspondentieadres: J. Van Ruysseveldt, Open Universiteit Nederland, Postbus 2960, 6401 DL Heerlen, tel. 045-5762839, e-mail: joris.vanruysseveldt@ou.nl.

Marius van Dijke
M. van Dijke is verbonden aan de Rotterdam School of Management van de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
Artikel

Kan het daderschap van pesterijen verklaard worden via het Job Demands-Resources model?

Trefwoorden harassment, perpetrators, JDR model, Three Way Model
Auteurs Elfi Baillien, Nele Sijmens en Hans De Witte
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

Workplace bullying leads to negative consequences and should be prevented. Studies investigating antecedents of bullying showed however two shortcomings. First, they mainly focused on targets, so little is known about perpetrators. Second, they rarely used theoretical frameworks to structure the antecedents. Therefore, this study aims to apply the Job Demands-Resources (JDR) model to being a perpetrator of bullying. We hypothesized that job demands related positively and job resources related negatively to being a perpetrator of bullying. We assumed an interaction effect between demands and resources and expected exhaustion to mediate the relationship between demands, resources and being a perpetrator. The results (N = 706) showed a significant interaction: job resources buffered the positive relation between job demands and being a perpetrator. No evidence was found for the direct effects and for exhaustion as a mediator. In summary, the JDR model is a valuable framework to explain being a perpetrator of bullying: job demands and resources interact in the prediction of being a perpetrator. Future studies may focus on other mediators that could explain this relationship.


Elfi Baillien
Elfi Baillien is verbonden aan de Human Relations Research Group, HU Brussel en aan de Onderzoeksgroep Arbeids-, Organisatie- en Personeelspsychologie, KU Leuven. Correspondentieadres: Baillien, E., Warmoesberg 26, B-1000 Brussel. Elfi.Baillien@hubrussel.be.

Nele Sijmens
Nele Sijmens is werkzaam bij Premed VZW, Preventie en bescherming op het werk, Tiensevest 61/2, 3010 Leuven.

Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte is verbonden aan de Onderzoeksgroep Arbeids-, Organisatie- en Personeelspsychologie, KU Leuven en aan North-West University (Vanderbijlpark Campus), Zuid-Afrika.
Artikel

Hoe willen werknemers na hun pensioen blijven werken?

Een studie naar vormen van langer doorwerken

Trefwoorden continue working, retirement, organizational climate, psychological contract fulfillment
Auteurs Tuğba Polat, P. Matthijs Bal en Paul G.W. Jansen
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

This paper investigates employees’ preferences for working after their retirement age and the (personal and organizational) factors that are related to those preferences. The study was conducted among 474 employees of three elderly care organizations. The results demonstrated that there are four after retirement work-profiles, namely: a work-profile in which the employee prefers to (1) work less; (2) keep the existing work-profile more or less the same, (3) modify the content of their work, (4) change the work context. Further analyses demonstrated that with increasing age, preferences to change the content of the work or the context of the work decrease. Contrarily, employees with a higher education have the preference for a work-profile with modified work content and have higher preference to work in another work context after their retirement. Further, the results displayed that employees who experience an accommodative organizational climate want to modify their job tasks and prefer to work somewhere else. Contrastingly, employees that experience a development organizational climate and psychological contract fulfillment want to modify their work involvement as little as possible.


Tuğba Polat
T. Polat is verbonden aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Correspondentieadres: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, faculteit Economische wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, De Boelelaan 1105 (Kamer 5A-42), 1081 HV Amsterdam, tel. 020 – 598 90 82, e-mail: t.polat@vu.nl.

P. Matthijs Bal
P.M. Bal is verbonden aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

Paul G.W. Jansen
P.G.W. Jansen is verbonden aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Artikel

Het nut van de item respons theorie bij de constructie en evaluatie van niet-cognitieve instrumenten voor selectie en assessment binnen organisaties

Trefwoorden item response theory, questionnaire development, noncognitive measurement, assessment
Auteurs Iris J.L. Egberink en Rob R. Meijer
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

In this article we discuss the use of IRT for the development and application of noncognitive measures in personnel selection and career development. We introduce the basic principles of IRT and we discuss the usefulness of IRT to evaluate the quality of items and tests to assess the measurement precision of a candidate’s trait level, and to investigate item and test bias. Furthermore, we describe several applications of IRT, including computerized adaptive testing and the development of item banks in an automated testing system. Finally, a list of software programs is provided to stimulate the use of IRT models.


Iris J.L. Egberink
Iris J.L. Egberink is werkzaam bij de afdeling Psychometrie en Statistiek van de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen. E-mail: i.j.l.egberink@rug.nl.

Rob R. Meijer
Rob R. Meijer is werkzaam bij de afdeling Psychometrie en Statistiek van de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen. E-mail: r.r.meijer@rug.nl.